
Bishops in Illinois have chosen to shut down a Catholic Charities program that refers foster children and assists with adoptions because in order to receive government money, they cannot discriminate against same sex couples. See the link:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/29/us/for-bishops-a-battle-over-whose-rights-prevail.html
It should be noted that the hands of the State of Illinois are tied. Now. I am nobody's constitutional scholar but it is my understanding that through precedent and case law, the 14th amendments protections have been extended to cover sexual preference. In other words, to discriminate against same sex couples in adoption services, by a government agency, is unconstitutional. Granted, Catholic Charities is not a government agency but the prohibition still applies to programs that utilize government funding. This is because if government funding is give to a discriminatory agency, it will be denied to a protected group. This same funding will be unavailable to organizations that operate within the law and serve all citizens without prejudice.
Nobody has forbidden Catholic Charities to operate in the manner that they say is in keeping with their interpretation of the faith. The Government simply refuses to support programs that operate outside of it's own laws. To deny these funds (which are involuntarily extracted from the tax payers) to same sex couples would constitute the state denying a class of citizens the "Blessings of Liberty" guaranteed in the preamble as well as "abridge privileges" specifically forbidden in the 14th amendment of the constitution.
The actions of the Bishops are clearly in conflict with the constitution but they are also theologically dubious.
In the New Testament, there is no reference to homosexuality in any of the Gospels so we can only assume that it wasn't an important issue to Jesus or the disciples. It is mentioned only three times by Paul: 1st Corinthians 6:9-10, 1st Timothy 1:8-11 and Romans 1:26-27. In all three of these passages it is mentioned almost just in passing among lists of other behaviors without any particular emphasis. These lists include trespasses such as idolatry and drunkenness, yet the Bishops single out this particular behavior and not the others in justifying the end of an important program that serves the children of the poor. If Jesus wasn't worried about it why are the Bishops so concerned?
There certainly are prohibitions against homosexuality, or rather homosexual behavior in some contexts, in the Old Testament. Genesis 19 springs immediately to mind. (Gn 19:5). The men of Sodom demand to have sexual relations with the angles under Lot's protection.
The legend of Sodom and Gomorrah is one of debauchery and deviancy in the ancient world. It would be quite a stretch to apply the same moral context to committed, loving couples who wish to raise children in the modern one.
The issue is raised in Leviticus as well.
"You shall not lie with a male as with a woman" Lv18:22
There is no escaping the fact that the passage is there nestled in a long list of other sexual prohibitions. Leviticus has many passages that are highly relevant to modern life. For instance there is an excellent treatise on the proper course of action to take if ones ox falls into a neighbors cistern. There is also excellent instruction on the proper method of smearing sacrificial blood on an alter.
The point here is that Leviticus is an extremely technical document written for a very specific time and situation. The Israelites were strangers in a strange land, constantly under attack with a brief from God to be prosperous and abundant. It stands to reason the child rearing would be a very high priority for the sake of survival. It is easy to see, and be sympathetic, to their reasoning. The simple fact is, given the technology of the time, same sex relationships were childless.
That having been said, the world has changed in the more then three thousand years that have elapsed since the time of Moses. We inhabit a planet with seven billion people. Reproduction has dropped in importance. Spiritual harmony and fulfillment are now what is needed. With spiritual wholeness comes joy. With joy comes peace. With peace comes prosperity. We simply cannot afford anything less. Like the smearing of blood on an alter, the prohibitions on same sex relationships simply are no longer valid. A committed and loving relationship between two consenting adults with a desire to raise a family cannot possibly be a sin.
This begs the question: Is the Bible a living document, that is to stay, relevant to the everyday life of human beings? Or is it to become just a dusty old book of superstition that is little more then a tool of repression? It is a matter of faith.
As a Catholic, I believe it is the duty of all Catholics to be of service to the poor. To deny the poor on the basis of vague scriptural dogma and declare that in so doing they are victims of a government "War on religion" is unconscionable and un-Christlike. It flies in the face of the Catholic tradition of service. It is yet another case where the Bishops lose their way in succumbing to reactionary dogma instead of glorifying the healing and forgiving nature of Christ.
I am a devout Catholic but I wish that the Bishops would at least once in a while just try to make it easy.